Review



silhouette function  (MathWorks Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    MathWorks Inc silhouette function
    Silhouette Function, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/silhouette function/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    silhouette function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    90
    MathWorks Inc silhouette function
    Silhouette Function, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/silhouette function/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    silhouette function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    RStudio silhouette function
    Silhouette Function, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/silhouette function/product/RStudio
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    silhouette function - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc matlab function 'silhouette
    a Surgery for recording l/vlPAG vgat calcium transients (top). Example l/vlPAG vgat traces (bottom). b Order of assays. c L/vlPAG vgat activity centered at eating onset (cricket assay n = 223 neurons; walnut assay n = 204 neurons). d Representation of behaviors in principal component space (PC) during cricket hunting (see example on left). Clustering quality was measured by <t>silhouette</t> score, which was higher than the chance level of zero (dotted red line) ( n = 4 mice; one-sample two-tailed t -test, t-statistic = 2.79, p = 0.059). e Same as d , but for walnut ( n = 4 mice; one-one-sample two-tailed t -test, t-statistic = 14.37, p = 0.001). f Behaviors were decoded above chance (red dotted line) ( n = 4 mice; one-sample two-tailed t -test, cricket t-statistics: approach = 3.87, p = 0.031; eat = 5.59, p = 0.011; walnut t-statistics: approach = 4.75, p = 0.018, eat = 7.53, p = 0.005). g Cells co-registered across assays. h Mahalanobis distance between points from two clusters that display higher overlap (left panel with light and dark blue points) and two clusters that are well-separated (right panel with light and dark green points). i Mahalanobis distance between approach and eating clusters across the cricket and walnut assays in n-dimensions ( n = # of co-registered neurons). The distance between eating clusters across assays is smaller than the distance between approach clusters, indicating the representation of eating is more conserved than food approach (approach sample n = 527 time points, eat sample n = 1958 time points; two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test, z-score = 22.88, p < 0.001). j Same as d , but for co-registered cells, showing conserved representation of behaviors across assays ( n = 4 mice; one-one-sample two-tailed t -test, t-statistic = 4.22, p = 0.024). k The distance between individual points and cluster center is smaller in the eating cluster than the approach cluster, indicating the representation of eating is more conserved across assays (approach sample n = 1049 time points, eat sample n = 5492 time points; two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum two-tailed test, z-score = 10.35, p < 0.001). *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, † p = 0.059. Data are presented as mean values +/- SEM. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.
    Matlab Function 'silhouette, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab function 'silhouette/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    matlab function 'silhouette - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    a Surgery for recording l/vlPAG vgat calcium transients (top). Example l/vlPAG vgat traces (bottom). b Order of assays. c L/vlPAG vgat activity centered at eating onset (cricket assay n = 223 neurons; walnut assay n = 204 neurons). d Representation of behaviors in principal component space (PC) during cricket hunting (see example on left). Clustering quality was measured by silhouette score, which was higher than the chance level of zero (dotted red line) ( n = 4 mice; one-sample two-tailed t -test, t-statistic = 2.79, p = 0.059). e Same as d , but for walnut ( n = 4 mice; one-one-sample two-tailed t -test, t-statistic = 14.37, p = 0.001). f Behaviors were decoded above chance (red dotted line) ( n = 4 mice; one-sample two-tailed t -test, cricket t-statistics: approach = 3.87, p = 0.031; eat = 5.59, p = 0.011; walnut t-statistics: approach = 4.75, p = 0.018, eat = 7.53, p = 0.005). g Cells co-registered across assays. h Mahalanobis distance between points from two clusters that display higher overlap (left panel with light and dark blue points) and two clusters that are well-separated (right panel with light and dark green points). i Mahalanobis distance between approach and eating clusters across the cricket and walnut assays in n-dimensions ( n = # of co-registered neurons). The distance between eating clusters across assays is smaller than the distance between approach clusters, indicating the representation of eating is more conserved than food approach (approach sample n = 527 time points, eat sample n = 1958 time points; two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test, z-score = 22.88, p < 0.001). j Same as d , but for co-registered cells, showing conserved representation of behaviors across assays ( n = 4 mice; one-one-sample two-tailed t -test, t-statistic = 4.22, p = 0.024). k The distance between individual points and cluster center is smaller in the eating cluster than the approach cluster, indicating the representation of eating is more conserved across assays (approach sample n = 1049 time points, eat sample n = 5492 time points; two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum two-tailed test, z-score = 10.35, p < 0.001). *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, † p = 0.059. Data are presented as mean values +/- SEM. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.

    Journal: Nature Communications

    Article Title: Control of feeding by a bottom-up midbrain-subthalamic pathway

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46430-5

    Figure Lengend Snippet: a Surgery for recording l/vlPAG vgat calcium transients (top). Example l/vlPAG vgat traces (bottom). b Order of assays. c L/vlPAG vgat activity centered at eating onset (cricket assay n = 223 neurons; walnut assay n = 204 neurons). d Representation of behaviors in principal component space (PC) during cricket hunting (see example on left). Clustering quality was measured by silhouette score, which was higher than the chance level of zero (dotted red line) ( n = 4 mice; one-sample two-tailed t -test, t-statistic = 2.79, p = 0.059). e Same as d , but for walnut ( n = 4 mice; one-one-sample two-tailed t -test, t-statistic = 14.37, p = 0.001). f Behaviors were decoded above chance (red dotted line) ( n = 4 mice; one-sample two-tailed t -test, cricket t-statistics: approach = 3.87, p = 0.031; eat = 5.59, p = 0.011; walnut t-statistics: approach = 4.75, p = 0.018, eat = 7.53, p = 0.005). g Cells co-registered across assays. h Mahalanobis distance between points from two clusters that display higher overlap (left panel with light and dark blue points) and two clusters that are well-separated (right panel with light and dark green points). i Mahalanobis distance between approach and eating clusters across the cricket and walnut assays in n-dimensions ( n = # of co-registered neurons). The distance between eating clusters across assays is smaller than the distance between approach clusters, indicating the representation of eating is more conserved than food approach (approach sample n = 527 time points, eat sample n = 1958 time points; two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum test, z-score = 22.88, p < 0.001). j Same as d , but for co-registered cells, showing conserved representation of behaviors across assays ( n = 4 mice; one-one-sample two-tailed t -test, t-statistic = 4.22, p = 0.024). k The distance between individual points and cluster center is smaller in the eating cluster than the approach cluster, indicating the representation of eating is more conserved across assays (approach sample n = 1049 time points, eat sample n = 5492 time points; two-tailed Wilcoxon rank-sum two-tailed test, z-score = 10.35, p < 0.001). *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, † p = 0.059. Data are presented as mean values +/- SEM. Source data are provided as a Source Data File.

    Article Snippet: The silhouette score was calculated across these three behavioral clusters using the Matlab function ‘silhouette’.

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Two Tailed Test